Year: 2002 Genre: Adventure, Family, Fantasy Director: Chris Columbus Starring: Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, Emma Watson |
Review: I first screening of this film at the local Cinema UGC thirly staggered and sat down and enjoyed this film, but in how I'm not a fan of the Harry Potter movies, Lord of the Rings or Spider-Man would enjoy something like that. I was a little younger audiences can see how much fun it can be, but to say the least, of course, Harry Potter is targeted at a young age, that it is today, the garbage is better than some. This is one of the main characters is Anoy crap, too old and broken voices are taller. A lot of the original cast returning and a few new characters, and Jason Isaacs, Kenneth Branagh, it seems. Kenneth Branagh at all, and quite frankly, that I adored, adored by women for their courage, charm and good looks play a role in Gilderoy Lockhart. He was one of the best bits of the movie Draco's father, Lucius Malfoy, who played Jason Isaacs was like. Jason wears a beautiful long wig, and he plays a lot like the villain in a T. Patriot him a bad father / plays the villain. Sometimes it has been canceled by Ron Rupert Grints. He is a great actor, but he can play his role satisfactorily. He could have done better, but I still have not read the book, I do not know how Ron would move. Werent convincing enough for me (a lot) of a person in fear of his scenes, I guess, but to me you guys have a good laugh. I think you're only young players to learn the art because it can take a guess how many were sent to the children, but they should get a pat on the back for those who play a role, . The SFX, Dobby, and especally character was awesome. He was great. I mean it was bad for the creation of CG, but there was no way you could have done differently that could not be the fact. In fact, Dobby the computer-generated character in the television series Stargate SG-1 (tissue-speaking), the speaker is very similar to the Lord of the Rings Gollum and CG Asgard looking for the best film and the top can just as well. Stargate SG-1 .. and if it's good. The CG spiders were creepy and very realistic. That kind of jump on me, so do not be afraid of spiders. If not, I often find myself doing this film because Harry and Ron, that was a good thing I did, I felt his body tense. The person sitting next to me in the spiders looked pretty scared. John Williams soundtrack back issues of old songs and music that sounds like Indiana Jones, the music was very similar to some of the original score. I took it up to someone else without realizing it most of the night, I sometimes found it quits pointed me to the main theme of Harry Potter. This film is more action-oriented sequences acciony absolute best was the first Potter film. I was very busy, as found myself pushing points. Potter-fan point of view and the story of the film is expected to be very short, very difficult to understand, I had no idea. I have more than 2 1/2 was like that lasted three hours. In some cases I have seen the first movie to understand something of what was going on, but mostly because the story is told and gags, some of which we have seen in the background. The only thing that bothers me the signs in the lobby and that was too long and could not get an ice cream, a little child crying for a few minutes in the middle of the first row. Whos going to bring a child to forget what the film next week? You may be asking yourself. If you're not a crazy-potter-fan, then I stand over 4 feet tall ... that is designed for the person that is to wait a few weeks. CHILDREN! (I'm not talking about the Dwarves) id give it 8.5/10. But I'm not a big fan of this movie, and I'm not the target. That's a good thing if you were wondering.